B. Tracey, Peer review and the Acceptance of New Scientifc Ideas, Sense About Science, p.61, 2004.

B. C. John, « The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review, JAMA, vol.263, issue.10, 1990.

. Chartron-ghislaine-odile, «. Gremillet-anne-solweig, and . Publier, à quel prix ? Étude sur la structuration des coûts de publication pour les revues françaises en SHS», in Revue française des sciences de l'information et de, Une économie renouvelée de la publication scientifique Perspective documentaire en éducation, pp.7-00117798, 2006.

C. Baptiste, L'Autolib' révélatrice de la sociologie postmoderne, Le Monde, 2015.

D. Tom, D. Marin, and . Pierre, Les carnets de recherche en ligne, espace d'une conversation scientifique décentrée, Lieux de savoir, T.2, Gestes et supports du travail savant, pp.333-352, 2006.

P. Fitzpatrick-kathleen and . Obsolescence, Publishing, Technology and the Future of Academy, plannedobsolescence.net GODLEE Fiona, « Making Reviewers Visible. Openness, Accountability, and Credit, 2002.

H. Stevan, «. The, and K. K. Maria, « Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by authorsuggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blid peer review models, Peer Review BMJ Open, vol.5, issue.9, pp.10-1136, 2000.

A. Kronick-david, « Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism, JAMA, vol.263, issue.10, p.03440100021002, 1990.

L. Michèle, How Professors Think, Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgement, 2009.

M. René, The Air We Breathe : A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process, Perspectives on Psycholocial Science Three Myths about Scientific Peer Review, p.40, 2009.

P. David and T. Didier, The Blind Shall See ! The Question of, Ada : A Journal of Gender, 2014.

S. David and «. The, Five Stars of Online Journal Articles ? a Framework for Article Evaluation-2, doi:10.1045/january2012-shotton SPIER R., « The history of the peer-review process, D-Lib Magazine, pp.10-1016, 2002.

R. Van-norden, Publishers withdraw more than 120 gibberish papers, Nature, vol.24, issue.02, 2014.
DOI : 10.1038/nature.2014.14763

M. Jelte, « Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals, PlosOne, 29 janvier 2016

W. Elizabeth, . Rooney-maeve, . Louis, and . Wilkinson-greg, « Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial, The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2000.